| Home
Search
Taxonomic browser
Keys
Study sites
Project
Methods
Links
Contact us
|
Methods Ant
collection
Ants were sampled according to the standardized A.L.L. protocol (Agosti
& Alonso 2000). The A.L.L. protocol consists of a line-transect of
20 sampling points spaced at 10m intervals. One Winkler and one pitfall
sample were taken at each point. For Winkler extractions, the leaf
litter present inside a 1m˛-quadrat was collected and sifted. The
sifted litter was weighted and its fauna was extracted with a
mini-Winkler apparatus (Fisher 1998). The Winkler extraction is based on
the passive desiccation of the leaf litter, forcing the ants to find a
more favourable environment and their nest mates (Krell et al.
2005). Standard extraction time was 24 hours. Pitfall traps consisted in
70mm-diameter drinking cups, containing water and a drop of detergent,
operating for 24 hours. Our study showed that during drought periods
pitfall traps were more cost-effective than the Winkler method (Delsinne
et al. 2008).
MauriceLeponce.jpg) |
MauriceLeponce.jpg) |
| Equipment needed for the Winkler method: from left
to right: meshed bag in which the sifted leaf litter is placed
and then hang into the Winkler extractor, sample bag (whirlpak),
balance to measure the weight of the sifted leaf litter, sifter. |
1m˛ quadrat delimiting the area where the leaf
litter is collected, sifted and then placed in a cotton bag
(hanging here in a tree) before to be extracted in the
laboratory. Gloves are a necessary protection against cactus
spines ! |
MauriceLeponce.jpg) |
MauriceLeponce.jpg) |
| Ants and other arthropods fall at the bottom of
the Winkler extractor. |
Pitfall trap. |
MauriceLeponce.jpg) |
MauriceLeponce.jpg) |
| Up to 50 Winkler extractors are used
simultaneously (here in Enciso National Park building). |
Samples are collected along a 200m transect
line. |
(images by ML)
Database
core: SIDbase
This website presents a subset of the data contained in
SIDbase, a database system developed by Maurice Leponce (with a MS-Access
database core) to manage biodiversity survey data and especially adapted
to ecological inventories of social insects. Its main features are: (i)
management of sample and specimen data through barcode printed labels
(alcohol proof, to speed up data entry and facilitate loan management);
(ii) quick storage and retrieval of numeric pictures on habitats and taxa;
(iii) tools for specimen identification (computer keys linked with an
image bank) and data entry (world checklist of ant genera); (iv) data
analysis friendly (filters for sorting data with respect to taxon, site
and sampling method; abundance matrices automatically exported to EstimateS
format); (v) simultaneous data-entry by several users.
Digital imaging
A Leica Z6APO microscope with a Leica DFC290 digital
camera is used to take the images with a 3 mega pixels resolution. To
overcome the problem of limited depth of field encountered in
microphotography, a series of images are taken at different heights. A
montage software (Helicon Focus) is used to combine the focused area into
a completely focused image. The system is operated by Yves Laurent.
Scanning Electron Microscope A
Philips XL 30 ESEM, operated by Julien Cillis, is used to capture the
scanning electron micrographs. Generally ants are coated with gold (to
enhance the contrast) before to take the image except in the case of
unique specimens. References
Agosti, D., and L. E. Alonso. 2000. The
A.L.L. protocol. A standard protocol for the collection of
ground-dwelling ants. In D., Agosti, J. D. Majer, L. E. Alonso, and T.
R. Schultz. (eds): Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring
biodiversity, pp. 204-206. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC.
Delsinne, T.; Leponce, M.; Theunis, L.;
Braet, Y.; Roisin, Y. 2008. Rainfall influence the ant sampling in dry
forests. Biotropica, in press.
Fisher, B. L. 1998. Ant diversity
patterns along an elevational gradient in the Réserve Spéciale
Naturelle Intégrale d'Andringitra, Madagascar. Fieldiana Zool. (n.s.)
85: 93-108.
Krell, F.-T., A. Y. C. Chung, E. DeBoise,
P. Eggleton, A. Giusti, K. Inward, and S. Krell-Westerwalbesloh. 2005.
Quantitative extraction of macro-invertebrates from temperate and
tropical leaf litter and soil: efficiency and time-dependent taxonomic
biases of the Winkler extraction. Pedobiologia 49: 175-186.
Leponce,
M. 2003. SIDbase. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, internal
technical report, 14p.
(538KB)
|